We said goodbye to Gordon* for the last time in late June
2025, and we won’t soon forget him. I say “we” as I think I’m speaking for all
of us who knew him as a colleague, friend, family member, or some combination
thereof. A colleague at our former mutual place of employment once asked someone
who worked for Gordon’s preceding employer, do you remember Gordon, to which he
laughed and replied, nobody who’s met Gordon can ever forget him. Amen.
*rule 17 doesn’t apply here, i.e., I think in this case it’s
okay to use someone’s real name without their prior consent; see his obituary
for more detail: https://storkefuneralhome.com/storke-funeral-home-obituaries/?id=2283
I could write a lengthy tribute to Gordon, but I won’t tire
you with that – his obit did a perfectly good job. Instead, I’d like to offer a
few unique encounters from which we might all gain something. But first, I’ll
ask Percy Sledge to help set the mood:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCMdjgaTLDs
I played this for Gordon once at the office when we were
testing the audio on a computer. He loved it. During his military career, he
had a side hustle as a DJ at the officers and enlisted clubs, and therefore was
familiar with a wide range of pop music, but he said the old school R&B that
he grew up on was his favorite genre.
Brass Management
Many firearm enthusiasts at one time or another entertain an
interest in handloading ammunition, i.e., assembling their own cartridges
rather than buying commercial ammo. Various motivations may apply, including,
(1) saving money, (2) customizing for accuracy, (3) recycling, (4) a hedge
against commercial ammo shortages, (5) the satisfaction of craftsmanship, (6)
making ammo for obscure calibers, for which ammo is expensive or difficult to
find, and (7) there are probably other motivations that haven’t occurred to me.
Let’s discuss 1-6 for now.
1)
Saving Money – somewhat valid but for most
calibers it would be at least a few years before you break even.
2)
Customizing for Accuracy – this is valid, but again,
you won’t see results overnight. Takes a while to get good at assembly and
experimental techniques.
3)
Recycling – not really valid; the only thing
that gets recycled is the brass. More on this later.
4)
Hedge Against Shortages – somewhat valid but handloading
supplies and components, and equipment as well, suffer the same economics as
ammunition. The only winners in this game are those who stocked up on
components when they were more readily available.
5)
Satisfaction of Craftsmanship – this is my big
motivator, i.e., a creative hobby with practical application. Plus #2 and #4
above apply for me as well.
6)
Obscure Calibers – valid for some handloaders. Ammo
for vintage or obscure calibers can be expensive or hard to find. I only
own/shoot the “normal” calibers myself, but I do know guys who have some
esoteric ones.
Back before Gordon retired, he picked my brain clean on
reloading (BTW, reloading means assembling cartridges with used brass;
handloading just means doing it with new brass). He had, among scores of other
firearms, a 50 BMG sniper rifle which was prohibitively expensive to shoot at
~$5/cartridge. So he wanted to learn to reload, thinking he was going to make
inexpensive cartridges for that behemoth. I offered what paltry wisdom I could
supply, which was basically, you’re going to spend way more on equipment than
you could ever hope to save, and you don’t have the borderline OCD personality
necessary to succeed at such an undertaking in the first place.

The other siren song for Gordon was the production rate of
the progressive presses (I use single-stage presses myself, for reasons I won’t
bore you with). In a progressive press, several things happen with each pull of
the ram, and a complete cartridge pops out the end each time. With
single-stage, only one or two operations happen with each pull. My point here
for Gordon was OK, the progressive press does assemble ammo very efficiently
compared to single-stage, but that’s only a tiny percentage of the time you put
into the overall process. The biggest time suck is brass management.
Let’s step back a bit for now. Gordon was a retired Army E9
(Sergeant Major), with experience mainly in infantry. Therefore, he was around
guns and firing ranges a lot, with a couple of key outcomes: (1) he suffered
hearing loss and (2) he loved guns.
Due to the hearing loss, Gordon spoke rather loudly, which
initially unnerved me. Apprehension abated when I discovered that the voice was
not accompanied by the anticipated overbearing personality. He did have a
strong presence but not to anyone else’s particular detriment.
He once asked me, why do people say I’m intimidating? Is it
because I’m black? (We were rather candid with each other; my office was
unofficially designated the non-attribution zone.) I said no, I think most
people around the office are pretty level-headed about race; I think it’s your
loud voice and command presence (Gordon was once a drill sergeant in military
life as well). We discussed what he might do about it; my general guidance was
to just be aware of it and try to not scare people.
Speaking of race, it came up in a different context in 2016
during the presidential campaign. Politically, Gordon was a staunch republican/conservative,
but said to me, I don’t think I can vote for Trump because he’s a racist.
Personally I tend to avoid politics around the office, but I could see he was
distraught, so I advised him to research the topic himself, as the only things
I’d heard about Trump’s supposed racism were from the DNC and the media,
neither institution being reliably objective during a heated political race.
About a week later he came back and said, you’re right, Trump’s not a racist.
He’s had many senior-level black employees, and supported black businesspeople.
And a bunch of other things – he really did his research!
Getting back to brass management, there are several steps
between picking warm brass up off the floor and assembling a cartridge from it.
1)
Cleaning
2)
Inspecting / sorting
3)
Annealing
4)
Resizing
5)
Depriming
6)
Trimming
Cleaning – some reloaders consider this unnecessary; I do it
to remove the toxins (part of the attached soot is lead fulminate from the
primer), to facilitate inspection, and aesthetics. Two methods for cleaning with
which I’m familiar are vibrating and tumbling. Vibrating happens in a hopper
filled with crushed walnut shells or similar media with a light coating of
cleaning goop. I used to employ this method, but switched over to tumbling when
I started getting concerned about lead exposure. Tumbling basically uses a rock
polisher filled with water, soap, and polishing agent. Tumbling doesn’t work as
well for aesthetics, but is better for removing lead residue, as you rinse
everything away at the end.
Inspecting / Sorting – the reloader should inspect every
case for cracks or deformities, and of course discard the offenders – you can’t
repair a case. Sorting – if you’re trying to maintain optimum consistency, some
reloaders will just use one headstamp (brand of brass) per batch.
Annealing – brass becomes harder and more brittle when
worked. The neck of a rifle case, from continued expansion and contraction,
will stiffen and lose its ability to be crimped to grip the projectile. To
restore its strength, it must be annealed, which takes the form of heating it
up (just the neck, not the whole cartridge) to a faint glow, and letting it
cool slowly. This doesn’t have to be done very often; full disclosure – I’ve
never had to do it.
Resizing and depriming – treating these together as they’re
usually done with a single die. The ram of the reloading press pushes the brass
up into the die to restore it to the proper diameter and squeeze out any
nonuniformities. A pin in the center of the die pops the old primer out the
bottom, at the top of the ram motion. The reloader should then clean (scrape or
brush) the primer pocket with a handheld tool.
Trimming – brass is a “soft” metal, relatively speaking.
During the firing event it expands and stretches within the chamber, and then shrinks
upon cooling, but not necessarily completely or consistently. Sometimes it
stays a bit long (it rarely gets shorter) and needs to be trimmed to a uniform
length. A tedious detail beyond the scope of today’s discussion – the
importance of trimming depends on the type of crimp you intend to use, which
depends on… well let’s stay out of that rabbit hole for now.
Note – some (most?) reloaders do resizing and depriming
last; I do trimming last, as the process of resizing can lengthen the brass
(the extra metal from squeezing the sides has to go somewhere).
After all this, the brass is ready for reloading.
I won’t go into the rest of the reloading process in this level
of detail but will instead just mention the basics: install a new primer,
charge the case (put in the powder), install the projectile, and crimp the neck
around its base or crimp groove. Voila, a shootable cartridge!
Is that all there is to it? Yes. So how do you get “good” at
it? Good ammo is safe, has the correct ballistics, and is consistent. To get
there, you must (1) get it right, and (2) control the variability. (1) means
use a recipe within safe tolerances; (2) means understand the sources of variability
introduced by each step of the process, and endeavor to control it.
Needless to say, when I dragged Gordon through all this
detail, I think I pretty well talked him out of attempting to reload
ammunition. He was plenty intelligent, but attending to the above details was
definitely not in his temperament.
One more Gordon story: he worked for the US Army as a
civilian, after retiring from active duty, and had a passion for developing a
certain type of system for use in the field. He did not succeed at the time,
and came to our agency to continue to pursue this goal. He and his team worked
valiantly on it for years, but alas he was aging out. He wanted to retire, and
had the means to do so, but really wanted to get this system fully developed
and fielded. He expressed this frustration to me, and was essentially conceding
failure. I said no, you’re not a failure. Your contribution was developing
people, not systems. I proceeded to enumerate all the team members and
colleagues that he coached and mentored, both in professional and life skills,
and how much they had grown as a result. I further advised that others will
pick up where he left off, and they’ll get the system fielded. With this, he
said thanks, he could now feel good about retiring.
Which he did in March, 2023.
The big tragedy was that after decades of hard work, saving,
and investing, he only got to enjoy a couple of years of retirement. His family
is well taken care of, but I’m sure they’d rather have him around, as we all
would.
So my message to Gordon, if they’re allowed to read the
internet wherever he is: don’t worry, your team members and former colleagues
will continue to pursue your legacy, and I’ll take care of the reloading. For
the rest of y’all I say this: it’s good to have life goals, but don’t let them
get in the way of living!
Dear reader: did you know Gordon, and if so, do you have any
good Gordon memories to add? Please leave them in the comments. Note, your comments
won’t appear immediately; I have to filter them for spam first.